Pre-Seed vs Seed: How Much to Raise and What Cash Trajectory in 2026
Arbitrating between pre-seed and seed: tickets, cumulative dilution, 18-month runway, milestones. An operational framework to decide the right ticket to raise in 2026.
This topic is part of our service
Outsourced CFO in France | Fractional finance leaderExpert note: This article was written by our chartered accountancy firm. Information is current as of 2026. For a personalised review of your situation, contact us.
"How much should we raise?" is the wrong question. The right one is: "What does each euro raised buy, and how much do we need to hit the next round's milestones?" Too many founders raise too little at pre-seed (12-month runway, panic at month 8) or too much at seed (premature dilution, Series A blocked). The pre-seed vs seed arbitrage is less about amount than about trajectory.
In 2026, the market more clearly distinguishes than before two configurations: a compact pre-seed (EUR 300 k – 1 m) to validate PMF, and a substantial seed (EUR 1.5 – 4 m) to execute growth before Series A. Skipping pre-seed is possible — sometimes desirable — when the team can convince a seed fund directly with solid initial traction.
This operational guide proposes a decision framework: typical tickets, required milestones, cumulative dilution, minimum runway, choice between BSA Air, SAFE and equity. It complements our foundational article Pre-seed: founder's fundraising guide (focused on the operational mechanics of a pre-seed) by concentrating here on the strategic arbitrage between the two stages.
Executive summary#
- 2026 pre-seed: ticket EUR 300 k – 1 m; dilution 10-18 %; runway 12-18 months; main goal = PMF proof.
- 2026 seed: ticket EUR 1.5 – 4 m; dilution 18-25 %; runway 18-24 months; main goal = scalability proven and ready for Series A.
- Cumulative dilution pre-seed + seed + Series A must remain below 45-50 % to preserve founder control. Beyond, motivation and negotiation position deteriorate.
- In 2026, two trajectories dominate: (a) BSA Air pre-seed → equity seed → Series A in 12-18 months; (b) direct seed without pre-seed when prior traction is convincing.
- The 18-month runway is the 2026 market standard for seed. Below, the next round is prepared in emergency mode and valuation deteriorates.
1. Defining pre-seed and seed in 2026#
Boundaries have sharpened in 2024-2026 under the effect of European venture capital tightening.
Pre-seed (2026): short round, led by business angels and 1 to 2 specialised funds, financing PMF validation over 12 to 18 months. No revenue or below EUR 100 k ARR. Team of 2 to 6 people. Dominant instruments: BSA Air, SAFE.
Seed (2026): structured round led by 1 lead fund + 1 to 2 co-investors, financing post-PMF execution over 18 to 24 months. ARR usually between EUR 100 k and 800 k, growth ≥ 15 % MoM. Team of 8 to 18 people. Dominant instrument: preference shares (equity).
Pre-Series A (2025-2026 concept): intercalary round of EUR 2 to 5 m for companies that have reached seed but are not ready for standard Series A (EUR 4 to 12 m). Massively appeared in 2024 due to delayed maturity of some post-seed startups. To be considered as a variant of an extended seed.
2. Typical tickets by stage and sector#
| Stage | B2B SaaS | Deeptech | Marketplace | Fintech |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-seed | EUR 300-700 k | EUR 500 k – 1.2 m | EUR 400-800 k | EUR 500 k – 1 m |
| Seed | EUR 1.5-3 m | EUR 2-5 m | EUR 1.5-4 m | EUR 2-5 m |
| Pre-Series A | EUR 2-5 m | EUR 3-8 m | EUR 2-6 m | EUR 3-8 m |
| Series A | EUR 4-10 m | EUR 6-15 m | EUR 5-12 m | EUR 6-15 m |
Deeptech and fintech tickets are structurally higher due to capex (deeptech) or regulatory requirements (fintech).
2026 observed variations:
- pre-seed tickets recover slightly after the 2023-2024 trough, with a French median of EUR 600 k;
- seed tickets remain below the 2021 peak (median EUR 2 m vs EUR 2.8 m in 2021);
- pre-money valuations stabilise at EUR 4-7 m pre-seed and EUR 8-15 m seed depending on traction.
3. Pass-through milestones: what does the seed investor expect?#
For a seed to close on favourable terms, the pre-seed must have produced five proofs:
- Product proof: functional MVP used by 30 to 100 paying users or signed pilots.
- Market proof: initial ARR EUR 50-200 k or qualified pipeline with observable conversion rate.
- Team proof: complete C-level (CEO + CTO minimum), 1-2 key hires made.
- Unit economics proof: observable LTV/CAC above 2, payback < 18 months.
- Scalable model proof: clear roadmap for the next 18 months with quantified hypotheses.
Without these five proofs, the seed turns into an extended pre-seed bridge at unattractive valuation. The scenario to avoid. Pre-seed planning must explicitly target these five milestones.
4. Choosing the instrument: BSA Air, SAFE, equity#
Three instruments coexist in France for pre-seed and seed.
BSA Air (Air Stock Warrants). Convertible into equity at the next round with discount (typically 15-25 %) and cap (maximum conversion valuation). Advantage: speed (2-4 weeks) and low immediate dilution. Limit: if the next round is delayed, conversion is postponed and investor risk increases. 2026 standard for French pre-seed.
SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity). US-origin variant, legally adapted in France. Mechanics similar to BSA Air but without interest and with harmonised drafting (Y Combinator template). Appreciated by Anglo-Saxon funds, less common with French funds.
Direct equity (ordinary or preference shares). Longer closing (8-12 weeks) with shareholders' agreement and bylaws. Appropriate for substantial seeds (≥ EUR 1.5 m). 2026 standard for seed.
2026 typical case:
- pre-seed EUR 600 k → BSA Air with 20 % discount, EUR 8 m cap, automatic conversion at seed;
- seed EUR 2 m → preference shares equity, pre-money EUR 9 m, post-money EUR 11 m.
5. Cumulative dilution: the projection to do before pre-seed#
The recurring mistake: reasoning round-by-round without cumulative projection. Yet every percentage given at pre-seed adds up with subsequent rounds.
2026 "clean" trajectory:
| Round | Ticket | Pre-money | Round dilution | Cumulative founder dilution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inception | — | — | — | 100 % (before pool) |
| BSPCE pool | — | — | -10 % | 90 % |
| Pre-seed | EUR 600 k | EUR 5 m | -10.7 % | 80.4 % |
| Seed | EUR 2 m | EUR 10 m | -16.7 % | 67.0 % |
| Series A | EUR 6 m | EUR 25 m | -19.4 % | 54.0 % |
| Series B | EUR 12 m | EUR 50 m | -19.4 % | 43.5 % |
At Series B, founders hold about 44 % — consistent with preserved control.
Degraded trajectory (poorly calibrated pre-seed):
| Round | Ticket | Pre-money | Round dilution | Cumulative founder dilution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-seed | EUR 1.2 m | EUR 4 m | -23.1 % | 69.2 % |
| Seed | EUR 1.8 m | EUR 6 m | -23.1 % | 53.2 % |
| Series A | EUR 4 m | EUR 14 m | -22.2 % | 41.4 % |
Out of Series A at 41 % instead of 54 %. The 13-point gap often translates into millions of euros at exit. Entirely explained by an over-dilutive pre-seed and under-negotiated valuations.
2026 rule: keep pre-seed dilution below 12 %, seed dilution below 18 %, and aim for cumulative dilution ≤ 50 % at Series B entry.
6. Minimum runway: the 18-month rule#
2026 standard: 18 months of runway at closing. Not 12, not 24.
- 12 months is too short: at month 6, the next round must already be prepared, distracting the CEO from operations during the critical phase.
- 24 months is generally excessive: ticket grows, dilution increases, and 30 % of cash sits idle.
18 months is the right size:
- 12 months of execution focused on milestones;
- 6 months to prepare and close the next round.
Practical computation: monthly burn × 18 = target ticket.
- Burn EUR 30 k/month → ticket EUR 540 k (pre-seed);
- Burn EUR 100 k/month → ticket EUR 1.8 m (seed);
- Burn EUR 250 k/month → ticket EUR 4.5 m (Series A).
Add 15-20 % buffer for surprises and timing slippage. Burn must be projected after planned hires, not on current burn.
7. When to skip pre-seed#
Skipping pre-seed and raising seed directly is possible and sometimes optimal in three configurations:
Configuration 1 — Experienced team with prior exit. Founders who have previously led a scale-up to exit or Series B+ can convince a seed fund directly with a deck and clear vision, no pre-seed needed.
Configuration 2 — Bootstrap traction. A team that has generated EUR 100-300 k ARR bootstrapped can skip pre-seed and negotiate seed at favourable valuation, no need to fund the validation phase.
Configuration 3 — Capex-intensive industry. Some deeptech (hardware, biotech) cannot meaningfully advance with EUR 600 k and raise directly a EUR 2-4 m seed to reach the first industrial prototype.
Conversely, going through pre-seed is recommended when:
- the team is young with no prior exit;
- no traction is yet observable;
- the target market requires a learning phase (B2B enterprise, regulated sector).
8. Case study: two trajectories compared#
Company A — B2B SaaS HR Tech, 3 founders.
- Month 0: incorporation, 10 % BSPCE pool.
- Month 6: pre-seed EUR 600 k in BSA Air, EUR 7 m valuation cap, 20 % discount.
- Month 18: ARR EUR 180 k, signed pilots, 6-person team. Seed EUR 2 m pre-money EUR 9 m. BSA Air converted at EUR 7 m with discount → 71 k additional shares.
- Month 36: ARR EUR 1.2 m, Series A EUR 6 m pre-money EUR 25 m.
Cumulative founder dilution at Series A: 53 %. Clean trajectory.
Company B — Marketplace, 2 founders.
- Month 0: incorporation, 10 % BSPCE pool.
- Month 4: pre-seed EUR 1 m in direct equity (no BSA Air), pre-money EUR 4 m. Dilution 20 %.
- Month 14: tight runway, ARR EUR 80 k, 8 % MoM growth deemed insufficient. EUR 400 k bridge at flat valuation. Dilution +9 %.
- Month 24: seed EUR 1.8 m pre-money EUR 6 m. Dilution 23 %.
- Month 42: Series A EUR 4 m pre-money EUR 12 m.
Cumulative founder dilution at Series A: 38 %. Degraded trajectory. The intermediate bridge and low valuations cost 15 capital points.
2026 reading: Company A invested 6 months of learning before pre-seed (MVP validation in own resources), raised in BSA Air to limit dilution, and reached seed with convincing milestones. Company B raised too early and too equity-heavy, with no PMF visibility.
9. Our chartered accountant analysis#
Three perspectives:
Perspective 1 — R&D capitalisation and JEI status as runway levers. An innovative company can capitalise its R&D spend on the balance sheet (intangible assets) to keep it off operating result. Combined with the R&D tax credit (CIR) (30 % of eligible spend, capped at EUR 100 m) and JEI status (Tax Code art. 44 sexies-0 A, 8-year IR/IS exemption + social charges on certain staff), an R&D startup can recover 15 to 25 % of its budget as cash or cost savings. This mechanically extends runway. See our Innovation financing: R&D tax credit, JEI service and our R&D tax credit / JEI startup simulator.
Perspective 2 — The "theoretical" burn mistake. Many founders reason on net burn (after R&D credit refund, after grants). Yet these refunds arrive 18 to 24 months late (R&D credit refunded in N+1, even N+2 depending on profile). The relevant burn for runway is gross burn without tax claim integration. This nuance radically changes the target ticket.
Perspective 3 — Weekly cash tracking as post-funding discipline. From pre-seed, set up weekly cash tracking with automatic alert below 6-month runway. This discipline, run by a fractional CFO or directly by the chartered accountant, allows triggering next round preparation 4 to 5 months ahead rather than in emergency.
10. 2026 watch points#
- BSA Air without cap — refuse. Without a cap, the investor can be massively diluted on a valuation jump, breaking trust.
- Unanticipated bridge — consequence of too-short runways. Always plan a 15-20 % buffer.
- Disconnected pre-seed valuation — beyond EUR 8 m pre-money pre-seed without traction, valuation becomes unsustainable at seed and triggers a down round.
- Multi-founders without clear roles — a seed investor demands an identified C-level (CEO, CTO). Three equal cofounders without dominant role slow decisions.
- Misuse of SAFE in France — the US SAFE must be legally adapted to the French framework (uncertain tax qualification otherwise).
11. Checklist: deciding your round#
- Do you have a 3-round cap-table projection (pre-seed → seed → Series A)?
- Does the target ticket correspond to 18 months of gross runway + 15 % buffer?
- Have you identified the 5 milestones for the next round?
- Is the chosen instrument (BSA Air, SAFE, equity) consistent with the ticket and calendar?
- If BSA Air: is the cap set and discount reasonable?
- If equity: have shareholders' agreement and bylaws been reviewed by a venture capital lawyer?
- Have you projected cumulative dilution at Series A?
- Are JEI status and R&D credit integrated into your runway projection?
- Is weekly cash tracking in place or planned post-closing?
- Do you have a plan B if the round takes 4 months longer than expected?
12. FAQ#
Should you always do a pre-seed before seed?
No. With an experienced team or solid bootstrap traction, skipping pre-seed and raising seed directly is rational and minimises cumulative dilution. Without these assets, pre-seed remains the protective stage.
Is BSA Air always the right pre-seed instrument?
For a EUR 300 k – 1 m pre-seed, yes — speed, low cost, deferred dilution. For pre-seed > EUR 1 m or with a structuring lead fund, direct equity may be preferable.
What is the maximum acceptable cumulative dilution?
50 % at Series A entry, 60 % at Series B entry. Beyond, founder negotiation position and motivation deteriorate sharply.
How to estimate burn correctly?
Gross burn = (fixed + variable costs - cash collected) over the next 12 months, without integrating R&D credit refunds or grants. Projected with hiring assumptions.
How long does pre-seed vs seed take?
BSA Air pre-seed: 4 to 8 weeks from first meeting to wire. Equity seed: 12 to 20 weeks. Anticipate.
Conclusion: trajectory beats ticket#
Raising "a lot" is not the goal. Raising just enough to hit next-round milestones under optimal valuation conditions is. This calibration discipline — compact pre-seed + substantial seed + controlled cumulative dilution — separates companies that arrive at Series A in a position of strength from those that arrive out of breath.
Our firm advises founders on multi-round cap-table projection, target ticket calibration, runway optimisation via R&D credit / JEI, and coordination with venture capital lawyers. For an audit of your financing trajectory or pre-seed/seed preparation, contact us via Fractional CFO for startups and SMEs or Growth strategy and valuation.
Official sources#
- Bpifrance Le Lab — French Startup Financing Observatory 2025.
- France Digitale — EY-France Digitale Venture Capital Barometer 2025.
- Banque de France — corporate financing market notes.
- French Tax Code, articles 244 quater B (R&D credit) and 44 sexies-0 A (JEI status) — Légifrance.
- BOFiP — BSPCE regime.
- Ordre des Experts-Comptables — startup cash tracking documentation.
Up to date as of 1 May 2026.

Article written by Samuel HAYOT
Chartered Accountant, registered with the Institute of Chartered Accountants.
Regulated French accounting and audit firm based in Paris 8, built to support companies across France with a digital and decision-oriented approach.
Sources
Official and operational sources cited for this page.
- Bpifrance Le Lab - Observatoire du financement des startups françaises 2025
- France Digitale - Baromètre EY-France Digitale du capital-risque 2025
- Banque de France - Note de conjoncture sur le financement des entreprises
- Légifrance - CGI art. 244 quater B (crédit d'impôt recherche) et art. 44 sexies-0 A (statut JEI)
- BOFiP - Régime des bons de souscription de parts de créateur d'entreprise (BSPCE)
- Ordre des Experts-Comptables - Documentation sur le suivi de trésorerie startup
This topic is part of our service Outsourced CFO in France | Fractional finance leader
Need a quote or personalised advice?
Our accountancy firm supports you through all your steps. Get a free quote to review your situation and receive a bespoke fee proposal, or contact us directly.