Loading…
SASU or EURL? Protect unemployment benefits or maximise monthly income? Take this short diagnostic and identify the most coherent launch structure.
There is no universally best structure. The right answer depends on your current benefits, income objectives, social protection priorities and how quickly you need cash out of the company.
SASU is often the preferred route when unemployment benefits matter, because compensation can be structured more flexibly while preserving cash in the company.
EURL is often stronger when benefits are not the main issue and the founder wants to optimise recurring take-home pay through the self-employed regime.
The main differences that drive the choice in 2026.
| Criterion | SASU | EURL |
|---|---|---|
| Director's social status | Assimilated employee | Self-employed (majority manager) |
| Unemployment benefits (ARE) | Can be kept with no salary | Reduced by TNS remuneration |
| Charges on remuneration | ~75–80% of net | ~40–45% of net |
| Dividends | Flat tax 31.4%, no contributions | Flat tax 31.4% + TNS above 10% of capital |
| Social protection | Close to employee status | Lighter |
Indicative comparison. The right structure depends on your personal situation.
It depends on your unemployment rights, your need for regular income, the social protection you want and taxation. SASU means assimilated-employee status (strong protection, heavier charges, ARE that can be kept with no salary); EURL means self-employed status (lighter charges, lower protection).
Yes: a SASU president who does not pay themselves a salary can keep their ARE (benefit maintained by France Travail), unlike an EURL where the self-employed remuneration reduces the benefit.
In a SASU, charges are roughly 75% to 80% of net (assimilated employee). In an EURL, TNS charges are around 40% to 45% of the remuneration.
Dividends are subject to the 31.4% flat tax in 2026. In an EURL, the portion above 10% of the share capital is additionally subject to TNS social contributions.
Often a SASU at first to preserve ARE while ramping up, then an arbitrage depending on the income pace. It should be validated against your specific situation.
Yes, the transformation is possible but has a legal and tax cost. It is usually better to pick the right structure from the start.
The legal form affects tax, social protection, financing capacity and future growth options. A short review often prevents expensive reversals later.
Set up my company with an accountant